|
|
Ever wondered what is inside those tiny B&W or Color cameras that transmit on 1.2 and 2.4 GHz. (left) This 3/4" cube contains a color camera c/w microphone. I had been working with 1.2 & 2.4 GHz FM ATV equipment so simply assumed these cameras were FM also. After trying to receive them with no luck using a Comtech FM receiver and then hearing sync buzz using the camera with audio, I realized that these cameras used AM video modulation. Drawing out the transmitter schematic confirmed this. |
![]() |
They may look large here but inside the camera with audio was a tiny Audio & Video RF Modulator Board, Microphone and Camera Board. Remember, these boards are slightly more than 1/2" square.
(below left) Another view showing the other side of the (below right) Front side of the |
![]() |
![]() |
|
This Black & White camera with no audio (right) is smaller still - only a 5/8" cube. It is shown on a penny for size comparison. Receivers for the B&W and Color cameras without audio (below) are the same and have an interface board that provides a video output driver and 5 volt regulator. The interface board in the receiver with audio also includes the 5.5 MHz sound sub-carrier demodulation circuitry.
|
![]() |
|
There are many versions of these cameras available so make sure you know what you are ordering if you don't want to be disappointed. The three units I had a chance to play with were pretty basic. More expensive versions have features that I would certainly recommend. These cameras had inexpensive CMOS sensors which are ok if there is adequate lighting. Lighting was ok in rooms with a large window during the daytime and in my very well lit workshop, but at night lighting in most of my house was insufficient to provide a usable picture. Other than for very specific uses, I would only consider cameras with CCD sensors which are more sensitive. Another big consideration is adequate automatic light control (ALC) to handle bright outdoor daytime lighting conditions. Many of these inexpensive cameras appear to only be designed to accommodate room lighting levels but this is seldom mentioned in advertisements. Only one of these three cameras was usable in full outdoor lighting. The receivers required frequent fine tuning, especially after first being turned on. The cameras had very simple transmitters with no frequency control and drifted with temperature and battery voltage. And the receivers had no automatic frequency control so they also drifted due to, in addition to other things, a variable tuning voltage derived from the temperature dependent 5 volt regulator. Better receivers are available that have automatic frequency control. Best would be units using FM modulation so look for cameras with receivers that feature, usually four, 2.4 GHz switch selectable channels. I have limited experience with everything available, but this should at least get you a FM unit. Whether units have automatic frequency control or are crystal controlled is next to impossible to determine without ordering and actually examining them. Radio Shack used to sell 4 channel Wavecom 2.4 GHz FM Video Sender units that were known to have a crystal controlled PLL circuit. However Radio Shack now sells it's own brand of identical looking video sender with only a simple free running voltage controlled oscillator with channel selection done by simply selecting different resistors in a voltage divider circuit. X10.com used to also sell Wavecom Video Sender units and the advantages of 2.4 GHz FM video transmission. But now I see nothing about Wavecom or FM on their web site which provides no useful information about the units they sell other than they operate on 2.4 GHz. I was asked recently for my comments on X10 equipment, but until someone leaves me some X10 cameras and receivers for a few days to work with, what X10.com now provides is anyone's guess. I did see one of their cameras advertised as having a CMOS sensor and suspect that they all are probably less expensive CMOS cameras. As for the units pictured here, I did find one easily corrected problem. I didn't lie when I said that the B&W and Color camera receivers are the same, but they were not the same when I first received them. The B&W cameras receiver was labelled 9 volt and worked fine but the color cameras receiver was labelled 12 volt and generated hum bars in the picture when operated from it's wall-wart. Upon first inspection, the receivers appeared identical but looking closer, the 12 volt receiver had a 20 Ω resistor, rather than a diode, in series with the DC input and a 0.51 Ω resistor connected to the 5 volt regulator input. The 0.51 Ω resistor provides 'fuse' protection and the 20 Ω resistor reduces the regulator's input voltage and therefore the amount of heat generated by the regulator. However, 20 Ω is too large a value, especially for a resistor not required. The resistor does nothing to reduce total receiver power dissipation and the regulator has no problem dissipating heat without the resistor. |
|
|
|
The receiver draws 239 ma and a 12 volt DC input is 7.22 volts after the 20 Ω resistor and 7.10 volts after the 0.51 Ω resistor at the input to the 7805 regulator that requires 6.64 volts minimum. Therefore the minimum input voltage permitted is 11.57 volts. The wall wort used read 15.02 volts on a digital meter, but dropped to 11.4 volts with 1.2 Vp-p of ripple when powering the receiver. The ripple voltage meant the minimum input voltage was 10.8 volts and our regulator output would include 0.77 volts ripple which accounted for the hum bars. A diode, rather than a 20 Ω resistor, is much better and not only reduces the minimum required receiver input voltage to 7.6 volts DC but also provides input voltage reverse polarity protection. Left - Place your curser over the image to see the resistor replaced by a diode. |